Crimson Red Sports
 
 

* Bowl Round Games
1st Game Deadline
Saturday
12/15/2018
12:20 PM

Tulane @
Louisiana
(Tulane -3.5)

North Texas @
Utah State
(Utah State -9.0)

Fresno State @
Arizona State
( Fresno State -4.5)

Georgia Southern @
Eastern Michigan
(Georgia Southern -1.0)

Middle Tennessee @
Appalachian State
(Appalachian State -7.0)

UAB @
Northern Illinois
(UAB -1.0)

San Diego State @
Ohio
(Ohio -3.0)

Marshall @
South Florida
(Marshall -1.5)

Florida Intl @
Toledo
(Toledo -6.0)

Western Michigan @
BYU
(BYU -12.0)

Memphis @
Wake Forest
(Memphis -5.0)

Houston @
Army
(Army -3.0)

Buffalo @
Troy
(Buffalo -2.5)

Hawai'i @
Louisiana Tech
(Hawai'i -1.5)

Boston College @
Boise State
(Boise State -3.0)

Minnesota @
Georgia Tech
(Georgia Tech -4.5)

California @
TCU
(TCU -0.0)

Temple @
Duke
(Temple -3.0)

Miami @
Wisconsin
(Miami -4.0)

Baylor @
Vanderbilt
(Vanderbilt -4.0)

Purdue @
Auburn
(Auburn -4.0)

West Virginia @
Syracuse
(West Virginia -1.5)

Iowa State @
Washington State
(Washington State -3.5)

Florida @
Michigan
(Michigan -7.5)

South Carolina @
Virginia
(South Carolina -4.0)

Arkansas State @
Nevada
(Arkansas State -1.0)

Notre Dame @
Clemson
(Clemson -11.0)

Oklahoma @
Alabama
(Alabama -98.0)

Cincinnati @
Virginia Tech
(Cincinnati -5.0)

Stanford @
Pittsburgh
(Stanford -6.5)

Michigan State @
Oregon
(Oregon -2.5)

Missouri @
Oklahoma State
(Missouri -8.0)

Northwestern @
Utah
(Utah -6.5)

NC State @
Texas A&M
(Texas A&M -5.0)

Mississippi State @
Iowa
(Mississippi State -6.0)

LSU @
UCF
(LSU -7.5)

Kentucky @
Penn State
(Penn State -6.0)

Washington @
Ohio State
(Ohio State -6.5)

Texas @
Georgia
(Georgia -10.5)

Tie Breaker:  How many total yards of offense will Alabama get against Oklahoma?

Dot View My Picks
Dot View All Entries
Dot Discuss

* Overall Winners
Merk
87-64 (818)

Catch Prothro
87-65 (631)

td57
83-68 (950)

2Stater
82-69 (856)

bama57
82-70 (697)

Chechem
82-70 (698)

SUPERCOACH
82-70 (1062)

81-69 (651)

ricky023
80-71 (772)

Bandit
78-66 (818)


* Most E-Cred
Kgoode35+
E-Cred: 1000009
2Stater 2Stater
E-Cred: 7023
Chechem Chechem
E-Cred: 6346
Jamos Jamos
E-Cred: 5795
pmull pmull
E-Cred: 5307
SUPERCOACH SUPERCOACH
E-Cred: 4753
Catch Prothro Catch Prothro
E-Cred: 4738
XBAMA XBAMA
E-Cred: 4632
ricky023 ricky023
E-Cred: 4254
Merk Merk
E-Cred: 3133
bama57 bama57
E-Cred: 3080
BAMADCHAMPSHIPS BAMADCHAMPSHIPS
E-Cred: 2846
KoKoPuf
E-Cred: 2722
cbbama99 cbbama99
E-Cred: 2701
Leewillie Leewillie
E-Cred: 2692
N.AL-Tider N.AL-Tider
E-Cred: 2680
Bamaphile Bamaphile
E-Cred: 2661
bamaphil bamaphil
E-Cred: 2595
Bandit Bandit
E-Cred: 2595
hscoach hscoach
E-Cred: 2592

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Possible FB Rules Changes  (Read 1187 times)
McBaman
Coach E. B. Beaumont
*****

E-Cred: 1138
Offline Offline

Posts: 2099


View Profile
« on: January 24, 2019, 07:02:41 PM »

If NCAA is so concerned about safety, why don't they outlaw cut blocks!!


Click here for link

Logged
N.AL-Tider
Coach Frank Thomas
*****

E-Cred: 2680
Offline Offline

Posts: 6050

N.AL-Tider


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2019, 08:22:22 PM »

Regarding the overtime issue, I would be in favor of pushing the ball back, say, 10 yards with every subsequent OT series.  1st starts on the 25 as it is now, 2nd the LOS would be the 35, 3rd, the 45, and so forth with still requiring them to go for two as it is currently.  If they make it harder to score by pushing the ball back then I think odds are that one team would likely score and the other wouldn't.   

But they didn't ask me... 
Logged

"Play by play, thatís how we win here."

Eddie Jackson  Dec. 2016
ricky023
President Denny
*****

E-Cred: 4254
Offline Offline

     Male

Posts: 27288

ricky023

To Be One Ask One


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2019, 08:50:28 PM »

Regarding the overtime issue, I would be in favor of pushing the ball back, say, 10 yards with every subsequent OT series.  1st starts on the 25 as it is now, 2nd the LOS would be the 35, 3rd, the 45, and so forth with still requiring them to go for two as it is currently.  If they make it harder to score by pushing the ball back then I think odds are that one team would likely score and the other wouldn't.   

But they didn't ask me... 


NALT that does sound good. RTR!
Logged

John 15:5
"The Preacher"
"Rangers Lead the Way"
1/75th Rangers
Chechem
President Denny
*****

E-Cred: 6346
Offline Offline

Posts: 55157

Chechem


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2019, 05:29:36 AM »

Rather than move the ball back, how about removing one player from each side with each continued overtime.  That's be more interesting too.

 
Logged

N.AL-Tider
Coach Frank Thomas
*****

E-Cred: 2680
Offline Offline

Posts: 6050

N.AL-Tider


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2019, 10:46:45 AM »

Rather than move the ball back, how about removing one player from each side with each continued overtime.  That's be more interesting too.

 
Ummm, I don't like that because it would totally screw up how the plays are called.  Plays are designed with 11 on the field and if you start removing them then that totally messes it all up.  You remove a WR but the defensive team removes a LB.  Next series you remove a TE and they remove a CB, etc.  It just wouldn't work.
Logged

"Play by play, thatís how we win here."

Eddie Jackson  Dec. 2016
Chechem
President Denny
*****

E-Cred: 6346
Offline Offline

Posts: 55157

Chechem


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2019, 12:13:08 PM »

Rather than move the ball back, how about removing one player from each side with each continued overtime.  That's be more interesting too.

 
Ummm, I don't like that because it would totally screw up how the plays are called.  Plays are designed with 11 on the field and if you start removing them then that totally messes it all up.  You remove a WR but the defensive team removes a LB.  Next series you remove a TE and they remove a CB, etc.  It just wouldn't work.

Forgot this:   
Logged

SUPERCOACH
Coach Bear Bryant
*****

E-Cred: 4753
Offline Offline

     Male

Posts: 22938

SUPERCOACH

"Let's go."


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2019, 01:12:35 PM »

Rather than move the ball back, how about removing one player from each side with each continued overtime.  That's be more interesting too.

 
Ummm, I don't like that because it would totally screw up how the plays are called.  Plays are designed with 11 on the field and if you start removing them then that totally messes it all up.  You remove a WR but the defensive team removes a LB.  Next series you remove a TE and they remove a CB, etc.  It just wouldn't work.

Forgot this:   

Logged

"The same thing win, that always won... and we just have a different bunch of excuses if we lose"
McBaman
Coach E. B. Beaumont
*****

E-Cred: 1138
Offline Offline

Posts: 2099


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2019, 03:31:25 PM »

A different idea.... starting in the 4th OT, put the ball at the 10 yd line.  You have four plays to score a TD & if you score you have to go for two.  No FGs allowed.
Logged
Catch Prothro
Coach Gene Stallings
*****

E-Cred: 4738
Offline Offline

Posts: 13153

Catch Prothro


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2019, 06:40:16 PM »

How bout just calling it a tie after 3OTs??    Huh?
Logged
Chechem
President Denny
*****

E-Cred: 6346
Offline Offline

Posts: 55157

Chechem


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 26, 2019, 05:33:02 AM »

How bout just calling it a tie after 3OTs??    Huh?

 Undecided  If you're indeed our king, you've gotta take a better stand than that!   

The main problem with OT is that the people who paid to be there at the game get the shaft.  All of the action is at one end of the field, and those at the far end can't see squat.
Just sayin'.   
Logged

2Stater
President Denny
*****

E-Cred: 7023
Online Online

     Male

Posts: 45441

2Stater

Kazowie!


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 26, 2019, 07:02:01 AM »

There is no reason they canít do it like the pros. Only difference would be that if the first team scores a TD, the other team gets their chance.
Logged

Catch Prothro
Coach Gene Stallings
*****

E-Cred: 4738
Offline Offline

Posts: 13153

Catch Prothro


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 26, 2019, 09:28:38 AM »

How bout just calling it a tie after 3OTs??    Huh?

 Undecided  If you're indeed our king, you've gotta take a better stand than that!   

The main problem with OT is that the people who paid to be there at the game get the shaft.  All of the action is at one end of the field, and those at the far end can't see squat.
Just sayin'.   
What they're trying to address is games lasting too long and player safety issues.  A 3OT cutoff addresses that directly.

If no team can win after 3OTs, they don't deserve a win.

With your proposal, after 11 OTs you have the same effect.   Laughing

Logged
Chechem
President Denny
*****

E-Cred: 6346
Offline Offline

Posts: 55157

Chechem


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2019, 02:49:24 PM »

How bout just calling it a tie after 3OTs??    Huh?

 Undecided  If you're indeed our king, you've gotta take a better stand than that!   

The main problem with OT is that the people who paid to be there at the game get the shaft.  All of the action is at one end of the field, and those at the far end can't see squat.
Just sayin'.   
What they're trying to address is games lasting too long and player safety issues.  A 3OT cutoff addresses that directly.
If no team can win after 3OTs, they don't deserve a win.
With your proposal, after 11 OTs you have the same effect.   Laughing

How about a substitution like in extra-inning baseball, where an assistant goes in as pitcher.  After several OTs the coach has to play QB. 
Logged

Catch Prothro
Coach Gene Stallings
*****

E-Cred: 4738
Offline Offline

Posts: 13153

Catch Prothro


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2019, 06:39:14 PM »

How bout just calling it a tie after 3OTs??    Huh?

 Undecided  If you're indeed our king, you've gotta take a better stand than that!   

The main problem with OT is that the people who paid to be there at the game get the shaft.  All of the action is at one end of the field, and those at the far end can't see squat.
Just sayin'.   
What they're trying to address is games lasting too long and player safety issues.  A 3OT cutoff addresses that directly.
If no team can win after 3OTs, they don't deserve a win.
With your proposal, after 11 OTs you have the same effect.   Laughing

How about a substitution like in extra-inning baseball, where an assistant goes in as pitcher.  After several OTs the coach has to play QB. 
I vote subbing in the head coach.  Saban in would guarantee a win.   Smiley
Logged
N.AL-Tider
Coach Frank Thomas
*****

E-Cred: 2680
Offline Offline

Posts: 6050

N.AL-Tider


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2019, 07:29:49 AM »

A different idea.... starting in the 4th OT, put the ball at the 10 yd line.  You have four plays to score a TD & if you score you have to go for two.  No FGs allowed.
They basically do that now after the 2nd OT with the exception of moving the ball to the 10.  IMO, it is logically more difficult to score from the 25 than the 10 but it isn't necessarily because from 25 yards out it opens additional plays that would be far less likely to work from the 10.  I like my idea better actually.  Surprise, surprise!  Wink  By moving the ball back an additional 10 yards per subsequent OT then that adds a bit of additional difficulty.  And to add to the suspense, only allow 4 downs, PERIOD!  No 1st downs granted for gaining 10+ yards... Of course, that could make it even more difficult to finalize the game too... 
Logged

"Play by play, thatís how we win here."

Eddie Jackson  Dec. 2016
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


* User Info
 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Next Game


vs.

Day: Saturday
Date: Aug. 31, 2019
Time: TBD
TV: TBD
Radio: Fun 92.7
Location: Mercedes-Benz Stadium
Atlanta, GA

* Who's Online
  • Dot Guests: 61
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 4
  • Dot Users Online:



* New Members
  • Dot tzadick - 14 Nov
  • Dot debtidefan - 11 Jan
  • Dot OneOfTheIV - 30 Jul
  • Dot mepboy - 02 Dec
  • Dot Crimsonchamp22 - 19 Oct
  • Dot CoachEidson88 - 05 Sep
  • Dot mr mako - 12 Jan
  • Dot bamarich - 12 Nov
  • Dot Bamarae - 31 Aug
  • Dot Red Elephant - 09 Jan
  • Dot TideRavens - 02 Dec
  • Dot mowood - 30 Nov
  • Dot PARMAN59 - 11 Nov
  • Dot EpicnessTV - 08 Nov
  • Dot wad3g - 22 Sep
  • Dot DCTBama - 22 Aug
  • Dot BamaMom - 03 May
  • Dot RideCharlieLikeAHarley - 14 Mar
  • Dot Msleroy - 14 Feb
  • Dot BamaWind - 25 Jan

* Board Stats
  • stats Total Members: 345
  • stats Total Posts: 355777
  • stats Total Topics: 47684
  • stats Total Categories: 2
  • stats Total Boards: 22
  • stats Most Online: 532

 
     
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Copyright © 2009-2019 Crimson Red Sports. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.728 seconds with 31 queries.

Google last visited this page February 07, 2019, 01:13:22 PM