Crimson Red Sports

Around Campus => The Quad => Topic started by: McBaman on January 31, 2020, 06:54:39 PM



Title: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: McBaman on January 31, 2020, 06:54:39 PM
This could create a real mess but it could also cut both ways.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/28608626/big-ten-athletic-directors-support-one-transfer-exemption



Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Catch Prothro on January 31, 2020, 07:42:08 PM
I have mixed feelings about it.  With a coaching change,  scheme change, or other factor that impacts a player's fit into a system, I can see how an immediate transfer and playing time would be reasonable.  However, I don't want to encourage players who didn't make the starting lineup as freshmen or sophomores to be able to just jump ship so easily.

Probably a Big10 proposal because they're hoping to soak up SEC players they couldn't sign out of H.S.

 :popcorn2:

 


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: ricky023 on February 01, 2020, 06:42:48 AM
I think this is crazy for why spend all the money recruiting and let the players just go where they want to and then the next cause they didn't get to start off let them go again. You have some players have 4 college programs before they graduate. RTR!


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Chechem on February 01, 2020, 06:47:37 AM
I think this is crazy for why spend all the money recruiting and let the players just go where they want to and then the next cause they didn't get to start off let them go again. You have some players have 4 college programs before they graduate. RTR!

Graduate?   :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

Tenn 58% football players graduate
Fla State 55%
South Carolina 55%
Arkansas 54%
Oklahoma 47%

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1731218-college-football-schools-with-the-best-and-worst-graduation-rates#slide53


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: ricky023 on February 01, 2020, 11:15:19 AM
I think this is crazy for why spend all the money recruiting and let the players just go where they want to and then the next cause they didn't get to start off let them go again. You have some players have 4 college programs before they graduate. RTR!

Graduate?   :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

Tenn 58% football players graduate
Fla State 55%
South Carolina 55%
Arkansas 54%
Oklahoma 47%

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1731218-college-football-schools-with-the-best-and-worst-graduation-rates#slide53


Graduate? Is hillbilly style. RTR!


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: McBaman on February 17, 2020, 07:32:24 PM
Now the ACC is supporting this idea.

https://www.al.com/sports/2020/02/acc-joins-big-ten-in-supporting-one-time-transfer-exemption-for-all-sports.html



Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Chechem on February 18, 2020, 05:23:46 AM
Best idea I've heard is ...

1.  allowing player to transfer and play immediately (once) to a school ranked lower than his (in previous year final rankings),

2.  sit out a year if he transfers to a higher-ranking school.

3.  After one transfer, he must sit out a year for second one.

MAY NOT HELP BAMA, BUT MOST FAIR.  IT WOULD SLOW THE SHOPPING BY QBs.


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: 2Stater on February 18, 2020, 05:33:00 AM
Best idea I've heard is ...

1.  allowing player to transfer and play immediately (once) to a school ranked lower than his (in previous year final rankings),

2.  sit out a year if he transfers to a higher-ranking school.

3.  After one transfer, he must sit out a year for second one.

MAY NOT HELP BAMA, BUT MOST FAIR.  IT WOULD SLOW THE SHOPPING BY QBs.

That's gonna kick us in the nards right there.  :lol2:


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Catch Prothro on February 18, 2020, 05:33:50 AM
Best idea I've heard is ...

1.  allowing player to transfer and play immediately (once) to a school ranked lower than his (in previous year final rankings),

2.  sit out a year if he transfers to a higher-ranking school.

3.  After one transfer, he must sit out a year for second one.

MAY NOT HELP BAMA, BUT MOST FAIR.  IT WOULD SLOW THE SHOPPING BY QBs.

I don't know what rankings have to do with it.   ???



Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Chechem on February 18, 2020, 05:39:43 AM
Best idea I've heard is ...

1.  allowing player to transfer and play immediately (once) to a school ranked lower than his (in previous year final rankings),

2.  sit out a year if he transfers to a higher-ranking school.

3.  After one transfer, he must sit out a year for second one.

MAY NOT HELP BAMA, BUT MOST FAIR.  IT WOULD SLOW THE SHOPPING BY QBs.

I don't know what rankings have to do with it.   ???

One problem with transfers is top schools stockpiling talent developed elsewhere.  This would help stop that. 


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: ricky023 on February 18, 2020, 06:56:02 AM
This is going to be a very slippery situation. RTR!


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Catch Prothro on February 18, 2020, 07:10:35 AM
Best idea I've heard is ...

1.  allowing player to transfer and play immediately (once) to a school ranked lower than his (in previous year final rankings),

2.  sit out a year if he transfers to a higher-ranking school.

3.  After one transfer, he must sit out a year for second one.

MAY NOT HELP BAMA, BUT MOST FAIR.  IT WOULD SLOW THE SHOPPING BY QBs.

I don't know what rankings have to do with it.   ???

One problem with transfers is top schools stockpiling talent developed elsewhere.  This would help stop that. 
I don't see that as a "problem."   :)

And from what I've seen, most transfers are seeking more playing time, not to be "stockpiled."  So I'd expect the numbers to reflect that, with more players transferring to lower ranked schools, rather than higher ranked. 

Plus, where do you draw the line, what is the distinction if they transfer from #64 to # 61, instead of the other way around? 

The lawyer in me says this is unworkable.  ;)





Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: 2Stater on February 18, 2020, 08:43:33 AM
Best idea I've heard is ...

1.  allowing player to transfer and play immediately (once) to a school ranked lower than his (in previous year final rankings),

2.  sit out a year if he transfers to a higher-ranking school.

3.  After one transfer, he must sit out a year for second one.

MAY NOT HELP BAMA, BUT MOST FAIR.  IT WOULD SLOW THE SHOPPING BY QBs.

I don't know what rankings have to do with it.   ???

One problem with transfers is top schools stockpiling talent developed elsewhere.  This would help stop that. 
I don't see that as a "problem."   :)

And from what I've seen, most transfers are seeking more playing time, not to be "stockpiled."  So I'd expect the numbers to reflect that, with more players transferring to lower ranked schools, rather than higher ranked. 

Plus, where do you draw the line, what is the distinction if they transfer from #64 to # 61, instead of the other way around? 

The lawyer in me says this is unworkable.  ;)





Do we need to perform an exorcism on you, CP?  :lol2:


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Hannibal Lecter, MD on February 18, 2020, 08:47:16 AM
I guess it would be too much to expect for the NCAA to emphasize commitment rather than entitlement.


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Catch Prothro on February 18, 2020, 10:52:22 AM

The lawyer in me says this is unworkable.  ;)


Do we need to perform an exorcism on you, CP?  :lol2:
Absolutely!   :lol:



Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: ricky023 on February 18, 2020, 11:08:59 AM
Well I always need a good lawyer. lol, RTR!


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: Catch Prothro on February 18, 2020, 06:15:56 PM
Well I always need a good lawyer. lol, RTR!
RTR ricky!   #+


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: McBaman on February 18, 2020, 07:37:52 PM
It's game on now.  The NZAA is looking into changing the transfer rules.  Why do I have the feelilng this is going to end up being a big mess.

https://www.al.com/sports/2020/02/ncaa-officially-looking-into-one-time-transfer-exemption-for-all-sports.html



Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: N.AL-Tider on February 19, 2020, 07:53:22 AM
Well I always need a good lawyer to ride my unicorn. lol, RTR!
FIFY Preacher...

 :lol3:


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: ricky023 on February 19, 2020, 07:58:48 AM
Well I do wonder how many lawyers will be in Heaven? RTR!


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: McBaman on February 19, 2020, 04:39:40 PM
This is going to be a complicated policy to develop.  How can a team protect its depth and its investment in developing players.  Good luck!

https://www.al.com/alabamabasketball/2020/02/sec-free-agency-let-the-poaching-of-football-players-begin.html



Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: 2Stater on February 19, 2020, 05:14:03 PM
This is going to be a complicated policy to develop.  How can a team protect its depth and its investment in developing players.  Good luck!

https://www.al.com/alabamabasketball/2020/02/sec-free-agency-let-the-poaching-of-football-players-begin.html



Watching Finebaum now. The subject is definitely a ship storm on his show today.


Title: Re: Big10 Supports One-Time Transfer Exemption
Post by: ricky023 on February 19, 2020, 07:28:46 PM
This will be a ship storm period. What the team needs to do is make the signees to sign a LONT(Letter of no Transfer). RTR!