|
Title: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Marshal Dillon on March 03, 2011, 06:06:54 PM I really could't believe this when I first saw it. Ohio State rated ahead of Alabama? :o
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/feed/2011-03/spring-football/story/spring-top-10-its-tough-to-bet-against-the-sec-and-lsu-gets-early-nod (http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/feed/2011-03/spring-football/story/spring-top-10-its-tough-to-bet-against-the-sec-and-lsu-gets-early-nod) Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Chechem on March 03, 2011, 06:24:20 PM Clearly, they've never seen the muscles on Sims.
Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: BAMAWV on March 03, 2011, 06:28:20 PM Clearly, they've never seen the beer belly on Sims. FIFY, CAT. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Chechem on March 03, 2011, 06:30:30 PM Clearly, they've never seen the beer belly on Sims. FIFY, CAT. :D :D Okay, Clearly they've seen the muscles on AJ. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: BAMAWV on March 03, 2011, 06:37:25 PM Clearly, they've never seen the beer belly on Sims. FIFY, CAT. :D :D Okay, clearly they've seen the muscles on AJ. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Chechem on March 03, 2011, 06:39:52 PM Clearly, they've never seen the beer belly on Sims. FIFY, CAT. :D :D Okay, clearly they've seen the muscles on AJ. Dang, upper-case leftovers. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: ssmith general on March 03, 2011, 07:00:13 PM That list is ridiculous.
Only OK and Oregon maybe should be ahead of us. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: BAMAWV on March 03, 2011, 07:05:49 PM That list is ridiculous. FIFY. BTW, I have better things to do than run around this board correcting your errors. TIAOnly OK should be ahead of us. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: ssmith general on March 03, 2011, 07:08:33 PM That list is ridiculous. FIFY. BTW, I have nothing better to do than run around this board correcting your errors. TIAOnly OK should be ahead of us. fify Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Marshal Dillon on March 03, 2011, 07:15:06 PM That list is ridiculous. Only OK and Oregon maybe should be ahead of us. I wouldn't even pick Oregon over Alabama. The Aabama D should shut Oregon down completely. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Chechem on March 03, 2011, 07:15:28 PM That list is ridiculous. FIFY. BTW, I have nothing better to do than run around this board correcting your errors. TIAOnly OK should be ahead of us. fify Meanwhile, back to reality. Oregon has the NZAA sniffing at $$$ spent on their recruits. They're sinking fast. Move us up. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: BAMAWV on March 03, 2011, 07:16:47 PM That list is ridiculous. FIFY. BTW, I have nothing better to do than run around this board correcting your errors. TIAOnly OK should be ahead of us. fify Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: ssmith general on March 03, 2011, 07:20:24 PM That list is ridiculous. FIFY. BTW, I have nothing better to do than run around this board correcting your errors. TIAOnly OK should be ahead of us. fify RTR Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: MLB10 on March 03, 2011, 07:22:56 PM So LSU is the best team in the SEC now...wow. They haven't been SEC champs since '07. Good team, but the best????
Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: ssmith general on March 03, 2011, 07:24:39 PM So LSU is the best team in the SEC now...wow. They haven't been SEC champs since '07. Good team, but the best???? And no mention of the miles factor. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Chechem on March 03, 2011, 07:26:45 PM So LSU is the best team in the SEC now...wow. They haven't been SEC champs since '07. Good team, but the best???? In a word, NO. LSU will beat Oregon and fly up to the top of the rankings, but they won't beat us. Their schedule is favorable, with a break before they play us. But (finally) we have that week open too. :P Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: MLB10 on March 03, 2011, 07:28:57 PM Hmmm, I didn't use a smilie.
Les Miles < Saban- We all know it. They all know it. That's why they're still so flippin' bitter about it. Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Chechem on March 03, 2011, 07:33:10 PM Hmmm, I didn't use a smilie. Les Miles < Saban- We all know it. They all know it. That's why they're still so flippin' bitter about it. No smilie necessary;got the sarcasm. I was building on it. But looking at the lSU schedule, I can't figure out where Les screws the pooch (had to check which forum language to use). He'll fail somewhere, but where (UK? WV? UT?). Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: MLB10 on March 03, 2011, 07:38:56 PM I didn't mean that for you...I mean I really didn't use a smilie. I dunno what I did wrong but I don't even have the iphone to blame for this one. :)
Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: CrimsonWing on March 03, 2011, 08:33:57 PM Stanford ahead of us after losing Harbaugh and another coordinator is rediculous and I am so tired of the Oklahoma train. Every other year they are preseason 1 or 2 and they have done nothing but disappoint. Outside of winning their 2 team conference and sliding into a BCS game only to get destroyed, what have they done??
Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Marshal Dillon on March 03, 2011, 08:41:15 PM Stanford ahead of us after losing Harbaugh and another coordinator is rediculous and I am so tired of the Oklahoma train. Every other year they are preseason 1 or 2 and they have done nothing but disappoint. Outside of winning their 2 team conference and sliding into a BCS game only to get destroyed, what have they done?? They make pretty good chili there and have some gorgeous cheerleaders. :D Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: CrimsonWing on March 03, 2011, 08:43:00 PM Stanford ahead of us after losing Harbaugh and another coordinator is rediculous and I am so tired of the Oklahoma train. Every other year they are preseason 1 or 2 and they have done nothing but disappoint. Outside of winning their 2 team conference and sliding into a BCS game only to get destroyed, what have they done?? They make pretty good chili there and have some gorgeous cheerleaders. :D Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: Chechem on March 03, 2011, 09:18:11 PM (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/images/05/26/oklahoma.jpg) I must be getting old. They look about 12. Where's Lame Kiffin? Title: Re: Alabama Not Rated in Top 5 in FB Going Into Spring 2011 Post by: ricky023 on March 03, 2011, 10:04:29 PM Well the plain truth is, the Sporting News has never been good to us. LSU is no way the #1 team in the Nation. One thing is for sure no matter who they put up there some time along the line they have to meet the Alabama Defense and somebody has to prove they can stand up. It's hard to do, just ask Michigan St. RTR!
|