Crimson Red Sports

Around Campus => The Quad => Topic started by: 2Stater on October 01, 2015, 02:18:32 PM



Title: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: 2Stater on October 01, 2015, 02:18:32 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/shooting-umpqua-community-college-oregon-182211198.html

Quote
What we know so far:

Authorities responded to reports of a shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon at 10:30 a.m.
At least 10 people were killed and 20 others wounded, according to initial local reports.
The suspected shooter is reportedly in custody.
A news conference is expected within the hour.

 :(  :pray:


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: ricky023 on October 01, 2015, 02:56:15 PM
Hey brethren I think has a topic about this too. Should they be combined somehow? RTR!


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: 2Stater on October 01, 2015, 03:00:09 PM
Hey brethren I think has a topic about this too. Should they be combined somehow? RTR!

I had actually posted this before Chech made his post in The Daily. Doesn't really matter, though.


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Chechem on October 01, 2015, 03:40:09 PM
My mistake.  I didn't check closely enough.


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: XBAMA on October 01, 2015, 03:42:30 PM
I feel for our college employees and students , dangerous place these days  :wall:


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: 2Stater on October 01, 2015, 03:48:04 PM
I feel for our college employees and students , dangerous place these days  :wall:

All schools, for that matter. These lunatics don't seem to discriminate. As long as there's lots of kids.  >:(


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: N.AL-Tider on October 01, 2015, 04:12:39 PM
I found out this morning that there are two 11th grade boys that have been bullying my 13 y/o, 8th grade son.  If I ever make it back home then I'm probably gonna get arrested for knocking to 11th grade boy's heads off... >:(


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: ricky023 on October 01, 2015, 04:22:18 PM
Lord Jesu, please have your Spirit among the families and faculty. The first responders Lord give them the strength to do what must be done to save lives. God may your message be received through all this. Lord please forgive the sins of the man who did this. In the name of JESUS we so humbly pray to you. AMEN/AMEN


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Marshal Dillon on October 01, 2015, 04:39:16 PM
Sure am glad that Oregon school was a gun free zone to keep good citizens unarmed. Plus, they had 1 unarmed security guard.




 :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: 2Stater on October 01, 2015, 04:41:59 PM
I found out this morning that there are two 11th grade boys that have been bullying my 13 y/o, 8th grade son.  If I ever make it back home then I'm probably gonna get arrested for knocking to 11th grade boy's heads off... >:(

Call me if you need help! I hate bullies.


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Marshal Dillon on October 01, 2015, 04:53:06 PM
I found out this morning that there are two 11th grade boys that have been bullying my 13 y/o, 8th grade son.  If I ever make it back home then I'm probably gonna get arrested for knocking to 11th grade boy's heads off... >:(

Call me if you need help! I hate bullies.



Count me in as number 3.




 :makemyday:





Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: N.AL-Tider on October 01, 2015, 04:55:12 PM
I found out this morning that there are two 11th grade boys that have been bullying my 13 y/o, 8th grade son.  If I ever make it back home then I'm probably gonna get arrested for knocking to 11th grade boy's heads off... >:(

Call me if you need help! I hate bullies.



Count me in as number 3.




 :makemyday:




Thanks, but when I get finished with the principle, assistant principle, two particular male teachers and those two 11th grade boys the school Superintendent (who I go to church with BTW) will be begging me not to go back over there...  >:(


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: bamalum67 on October 01, 2015, 05:18:19 PM
About the bullies..don't mess with the kids..you'll go to jail..get the names of their parents/caregivers/granmas/aunties/etc..then go kick their arses, and tell them why you did it.
stupid kids are raised by stupid parents


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Jamos on October 01, 2015, 05:57:45 PM
I found out this morning that there are two 11th grade boys that have been bullying my 13 y/o, 8th grade son.  If I ever make it back home then I'm probably gonna get arrested for knocking to 11th grade boy's heads off... >:(

It's amazing how the selective discipline works in some of these schools. >:(


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Merk on October 02, 2015, 05:24:36 PM
What a terrible tragedy.
It's going to come to the point that we'll all have to carry just to go to the grocery store.  :(


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: SUPERCOACH on October 02, 2015, 06:42:48 PM
What a terrible tragedy.
It's going to come to the point that we'll all have to carry just to go to the grocery store.  :(

Won't do any good.  This was a "gun free zone."  :eyeroll:

They had 1 security guard, and he was unarmed.

The solution here may be to have armed officers on campus.  The only reason these nut jobs go to these schools to shoot up the kids is because they know it will be easy pickings and they will be able to take out as many innocent victims as possible when they go down in a blaze of glory.

Officers on campus would definitely solve the problem, but is that what we want?  I would need to think about it some more, but at first glance I don't think I would have a problem with it.

I would really love to hear some opinions from the folks who actually work in schools.


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Chechem on October 02, 2015, 07:36:32 PM
...

Officers on campus would definitely solve the problem, but is that what we want?  I would need to think about it some more, but at first glance I don't think I would have a problem with it.

I would really love to hear some opinions from the folks who actually work in schools.

What do you want to know?  
Do you mean high schools or colleges?
Universities are the same as any workplace; folks go there to work, and never expect anybody to start shooting.  And there are armed police all over campus.
I'm surprised that most universities allow anybody (ANYBODY) to walk freely about campus.  Some real threatening types show up periodically.  I've visited schools in the NE, and those are usually fenced and marked with signs indicating they are closed to the public.  I recall seeing such signs (NO TRESPASSING) for the first time at Brown, and later at William and Mary during the late 1980s.  Most southern campuses allow people to enter, walk among the students, and eat on campus.  Just a matter of time before that ends.


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Marshal Dillon on October 02, 2015, 09:03:35 PM
What a terrible tragedy.
It's going to come to the point that we'll all have to carry just to go to the grocery store.  :(



I do that now. Also, at the convenience store, movie theater, drug store, barber shop, etc.



 :dog:





Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: SUPERCOACH on October 02, 2015, 09:30:40 PM
...

Officers on campus would definitely solve the problem, but is that what we want?  I would need to think about it some more, but at first glance I don't think I would have a problem with it.

I would really love to hear some opinions from the folks who actually work in schools.

What do you want to know? 
Do you mean high schools or colleges?
Universities are the same as any workplace; folks go there to work, and never expect anybody to start shooting.  And there are armed police all over campus.
I'm surprised that most universities allow anybody (ANYBODY) to walk freely about campus.  Some real threatening types show up periodically.  I've visited schools in the NE, and those are usually fenced and marked with signs indicating they are closed to the public.  I recall seeing such signs (NO TRESPASSING) for the first time at Brown, and later at William and Mary during the late 1980s.  Most southern campuses allow people to enter, walk among the students, and eat on campus.  Just a matter of time before that ends.

Any school.  What I really would like to hear are some ideas on how we prevent this from happening as much as we can.  And I think people who work at a school (elementary through college) and face this possibility daily might be in a better position to offer up those ideas than people who only think about this when there is a tragedy.

This particular school had 1 security guard that was unarmed.  There were talking heads on TV last night opposed to having armed security officers at schools but I'm not sure why.  I don't see a downside to be honest.  I can see not allowing students and/or teachers to have guns, that seems like a reasonable policy and I could go either way.  But if you have that policy you better have someone else on campus who is in a position to act immediately when something like this happens.

I saw an interview with a past SGA president of the school and he said they had a discussion about whether they should have armed security and the school was split 50/50.  He said in the end they chose not to because it seemed like a peaceful place and they did not want to change the culture of the campus.  Does it really change the culture of the campus if you have a half dozen or so uniformed police officers patrolling throughout the day?

The mere presence of those armed officers may be enough to deter one of these nut job cowards from even going there in the first place.  They go there because it is easy to inflict mass carnage.  If they know they will have a fight on their hands and even be outnumbered as soon as they show up, they probably don't go there to begin with.


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Marshal Dillon on October 02, 2015, 10:47:23 PM
...

Officers on campus would definitely solve the problem, but is that what we want?  I would need to think about it some more, but at first glance I don't think I would have a problem with it.

I would really love to hear some opinions from the folks who actually work in schools.

What do you want to know? 
Do you mean high schools or colleges?
Universities are the same as any workplace; folks go there to work, and never expect anybody to start shooting.  And there are armed police all over campus.
I'm surprised that most universities allow anybody (ANYBODY) to walk freely about campus.  Some real threatening types show up periodically.  I've visited schools in the NE, and those are usually fenced and marked with signs indicating they are closed to the public.  I recall seeing such signs (NO TRESPASSING) for the first time at Brown, and later at William and Mary during the late 1980s.  Most southern campuses allow people to enter, walk among the students, and eat on campus.  Just a matter of time before that ends.

Any school.  What I really would like to hear are some ideas on how we prevent this from happening as much as we can.  And I think people who work at a school (elementary through college) and face this possibility daily might be in a better position to offer up those ideas than people who only think about this when there is a tragedy.

This particular school had 1 security guard that was unarmed.  There were talking heads on TV last night opposed to having armed security officers at schools but I'm not sure why.  I don't see a downside to be honest.  I can see not allowing students and/or teachers to have guns, that seems like a reasonable policy and I could go either way.  But if you have that policy you better have someone else on campus who is in a position to act immediately when something like this happens.

I saw an interview with a past SGA president of the school and he said they had a discussion about whether they should have armed security and the school was split 50/50.  He said in the end they chose not to because it seemed like a peaceful place and they did not want to change the culture of the campus.  Does it really change the culture of the campus if you have a half dozen or so uniformed police officers patrolling throughout the day?

The mere presence of those armed officers may be enough to deter one of these nut job cowards from even going there in the first place.  They go there because it is easy to inflict mass carnage.  If they know they will have a fight on their hands and even be outnumbered as soon as they show up, they probably don't go there to begin with.



I say at least one armed police officer with a marked police car sitting in front of the school (mainly elementary, middle, & high schools), is a good starting point. The Oregon community college had 3,000 students & ONE unarmed security guard. That's an embarrassing joke. How about college students with a military &/or law enforcement background being able to carry concealed on campus? Also, students age 25 & over who attend specialized training at the Sheriff's Department & have had a good background check be able to carry concealed? We have to think outside the box on this. Having a college police department would have been nice, too in Oregon.






Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Old Tider on October 02, 2015, 11:11:09 PM
...

Officers on campus would definitely solve the problem, but is that what we want?  I would need to think about it some more, but at first glance I don't think I would have a problem with it.

I would really love to hear some opinions from the folks who actually work in schools.

What do you want to know? 
Do you mean high schools or colleges?
Universities are the same as any workplace; folks go there to work, and never expect anybody to start shooting.  And there are armed police all over campus.
I'm surprised that most universities allow anybody (ANYBODY) to walk freely about campus.  Some real threatening types show up periodically.  I've visited schools in the NE, and those are usually fenced and marked with signs indicating they are closed to the public.  I recall seeing such signs (NO TRESPASSING) for the first time at Brown, and later at William and Mary during the late 1980s.  Most southern campuses allow people to enter, walk among the students, and eat on campus.  Just a matter of time before that ends.

Any school.  What I really would like to hear are some ideas on how we prevent this from happening as much as we can.  And I think people who work at a school (elementary through college) and face this possibility daily might be in a better position to offer up those ideas than people who only think about this when there is a tragedy.

This particular school had 1 security guard that was unarmed.  There were talking heads on TV last night opposed to having armed security officers at schools but I'm not sure why.  I don't see a downside to be honest.  I can see not allowing students and/or teachers to have guns, that seems like a reasonable policy and I could go either way.  But if you have that policy you better have someone else on campus who is in a position to act immediately when something like this happens.

I saw an interview with a past SGA president of the school and he said they had a discussion about whether they should have armed security and the school was split 50/50.  He said in the end they chose not to because it seemed like a peaceful place and they did not want to change the culture of the campus.  Does it really change the culture of the campus if you have a half dozen or so uniformed police officers patrolling throughout the day?

The mere presence of those armed officers may be enough to deter one of these nut job cowards from even going there in the first place.  They go there because it is easy to inflict mass carnage.  If they know they will have a fight on their hands and even be outnumbered as soon as they show up, they probably don't go there to begin with.



I say at least one armed police officer with a marked police car sitting in front of the school (mainly elementary, middle, & high schools), is a good starting point. The Oregon community college had 3,000 students & ONE unarmed security guard. That's an embarrassing joke. How about college students with a military &/or law enforcement background being able to carry concealed on campus? Also, students age 25 & over who attend specialized training at the Sheriff's Department & have had a good background check be able to carry concealed? We have to think outside the box on this. Having a college police department would have been nice, too in Oregon.




I agree with one or more armed officers, but don't believe giving more and more people more and more guns is the answer.  The whole country is virtually an armed camp already. 


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Marshal Dillon on October 02, 2015, 11:41:58 PM
...

Officers on campus would definitely solve the problem, but is that what we want?  I would need to think about it some more, but at first glance I don't think I would have a problem with it.

I would really love to hear some opinions from the folks who actually work in schools.

What do you want to know? 
Do you mean high schools or colleges?
Universities are the same as any workplace; folks go there to work, and never expect anybody to start shooting.  And there are armed police all over campus.
I'm surprised that most universities allow anybody (ANYBODY) to walk freely about campus.  Some real threatening types show up periodically.  I've visited schools in the NE, and those are usually fenced and marked with signs indicating they are closed to the public.  I recall seeing such signs (NO TRESPASSING) for the first time at Brown, and later at William and Mary during the late 1980s.  Most southern campuses allow people to enter, walk among the students, and eat on campus.  Just a matter of time before that ends.

Any school.  What I really would like to hear are some ideas on how we prevent this from happening as much as we can.  And I think people who work at a school (elementary through college) and face this possibility daily might be in a better position to offer up those ideas than people who only think about this when there is a tragedy.

This particular school had 1 security guard that was unarmed.  There were talking heads on TV last night opposed to having armed security officers at schools but I'm not sure why.  I don't see a downside to be honest.  I can see not allowing students and/or teachers to have guns, that seems like a reasonable policy and I could go either way.  But if you have that policy you better have someone else on campus who is in a position to act immediately when something like this happens.

I saw an interview with a past SGA president of the school and he said they had a discussion about whether they should have armed security and the school was split 50/50.  He said in the end they chose not to because it seemed like a peaceful place and they did not want to change the culture of the campus.  Does it really change the culture of the campus if you have a half dozen or so uniformed police officers patrolling throughout the day?

The mere presence of those armed officers may be enough to deter one of these nut job cowards from even going there in the first place.  They go there because it is easy to inflict mass carnage.  If they know they will have a fight on their hands and even be outnumbered as soon as they show up, they probably don't go there to begin with.



I say at least one armed police officer with a marked police car sitting in front of the school (mainly elementary, middle, & high schools), is a good starting point. The Oregon community college had 3,000 students & ONE unarmed security guard. That's an embarrassing joke. How about college students with a military &/or law enforcement background being able to carry concealed on campus? Also, students age 25 & over who attend specialized training at the Sheriff's Department & have had a good background check be able to carry concealed? We have to think outside the box on this. Having a college police department would have been nice, too in Oregon.




I agree with one or more armed officers, but don't believe giving more and more people more and more guns is the answer.  The whole country is virtually an armed camp already. 



It's not about the gun, it's about the person who has the gun. Folks with military/law enforcement backgrounds should know how to handle a weapon & when to use it. Again, not talking about just letting anyone carry concealed on the campus. Someone who wants to do harm is not going to be stopped by laws, gun free zone signs, or other abstract things. One armed person could have made a difference in all these nut job attacks. Imagine walking around the campus of UAB, in the dark, in downtown Birmingham.











Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: Chechem on October 03, 2015, 06:09:24 AM
First the UCC campus was a "gun-free zone", but there were armed people there.  Oregon allows students and faculty with concealed-carry permits to have guns on college campuses, and there were guns present.  One of the armed students was interviewed last night (Friday).  He said there was little they could do; weren't in the same building at the time.

You asked for ideas/opinions from those who work on campuses.  My opinion is the police should handle the security.  I do not want faculty armed.  We have faculty who are military veterans, and they agree.  More weapons will mean more chance of accidents, possibility of precipitous actions caused by gun presence, and likelihood that approved people would lack continuous and/or adequate training.  Mississippi already allows concealed-carry permits for guns on college campuses, churches, and schools.  It requires an enhanced permit, which costs $99 and a one-time training session.  A basic carry permit is required for those who would purchase an enhanced permit.  Not much training, eh?

The best way to protect campuses is to ...
1. limit access on campus; only those who should be there be allowed in;
2. support university police with funding commensurate with expectations, keep them trained, and have them present at all campus activities;
3. dismiss students or faculty who pose a threat (laws protect nuts these days, and dismissal of students and faculty is almost impossible until they break a law; difficult even then);
4. change rules for major events, like football games.  It's a miracle that mass-murder events haven't targeted athletic events.  Everyone entering a game should pass through a metal detector, etc.


Title: Re: 10 Dead in shooting at Oregon Community College
Post by: SUPERCOACH on October 03, 2015, 01:53:04 PM
First the UCC campus was a "gun-free zone", but there were armed people there.  Oregon allows students and faculty with concealed-carry permits to have guns on college campuses, and there were guns present.  One of the armed students was interviewed last night (Friday).  He said there was little they could do; weren't in the same building at the time.

You asked for ideas/opinions from those who work on campuses.  My opinion is the police should handle the security.  I do not want faculty armed.  We have faculty who are military veterans, and they agree.  More weapons will mean more chance of accidents, possibility of precipitous actions caused by gun presence, and likelihood that approved people would lack continuous and/or adequate training.  Mississippi already allows concealed-carry permits for guns on college campuses, churches, and schools.  It requires an enhanced permit, which costs $99 and a one-time training session.  A basic carry permit is required for those who would purchase an enhanced permit.  Not much training, eh?

The best way to protect campuses is to ...
1. limit access on campus; only those who should be there be allowed in;
2. support university police with funding commensurate with expectations, keep them trained, and have them present at all campus activities;
3. dismiss students or faculty who pose a threat (laws protect nuts these days, and dismissal of students and faculty is almost impossible until they break a law; difficult even then);
4. change rules for major events, like football games.  It's a miracle that mass-murder events haven't targeted athletic events.  Everyone entering a game should pass through a metal detector, etc.

Now this sounds like a solid plan.  :clap: