Crimson Red Sports

Around Campus => Reese Phifer Hall => Topic started by: WALL-E on May 31, 2013, 05:16:03 AM

Title: "Alabama AD Bill Battle isn't necessarily opposed to paying college players, but questions how"
Post by: WALL-E on May 31, 2013, 05:16:03 AM

Alabama AD Bill Battle isn't necessarily opposed to paying college players, but questions how

By Jon Solomon | jsolomon@al.com
Published May 31, 2013, 05:00:00 AM

(http://media.al.com/sports_impact/photo/bill-battlejpg-ac7b12300a677c3b.jpg)Auburn President Jay Gogue says players get enough value from items such as training and medical costs.

Read more...

Title: Re: "Alabama AD Bill Battle isn't necessarily opposed to paying college players, but questions how"
Post by: SUPERCOACH on May 31, 2013, 12:34:12 PM

Auburn doesn't want it to be legal to pay players because that would level the playing field. :lol:

Title: Re: "Alabama AD Bill Battle isn't necessarily opposed to paying college players, but questions how"
Post by: ricky023 on May 31, 2013, 04:06:49 PM

Quote from: SUPERCOACH on May 31, 2013, 12:34:12 PM

Auburn doesn't want it to be legal to pay players because that would level the playing field. :lol:

#+, you got that right SC. Boy just think if the playing field is level auburn might never get a good recruit. RTR!