The spread offense doesn't promote ball control.
This is true. There is a balance between power and the spread.
That was evident against Washington and it cost us against Clemson.
Allowing 21 pts in the fourth quarter cost BAMA the Clemson game.
BAMA rushed for over 200yds and averaged more than 6yds/carry.
The loss of Scarborough during the game cannot be understated and placed all the pressure on Hurts.
Also, Eddie Jackson's absence made the elevation of the uphill grade that much more steep.
I know that an anemic passing game had a lot to do with that, but I think we are still better suited to a power offensive game.
BAMA's passing game was most certainly anemic.
Clemson rushed for less than 100yds and threw for over 400yds.
Very "spread-like" offensive totals and scheme that beat BAMA.
I do believe that the behind the scenes coaching meltdown/implosion/ soap opera had a lot to do with the poor offensive performance in both games.
Coach Bryant said, "You lose one game for every freshman you play."
By his measure BAMA was lucky to have made it to the NC game.
He knew a little about football.
So, why do you not want 3 more SEC and 1 more National Championships?