Bowl Round Winners
|
24-10 (155)
21-13 (2)
20-14 (44)
18-14 (42)
18-16 (53)
|
Overall Winners
|
86-66 (1214)
86-66 (1469)
85-64 (1075)
84-67 (1137)
83-67 (1264)
82-70 (1278)
80-67 (1227)
80-69 (1392)
80-71 (1119)
79-73 (1307)
|
Most E-Cred
|
|
|
13396
|
Around Campus / The Quad / Re: Incoming frosh Alec Morris 'fired up' by opportunity to compete for backup QB
|
on: May 14, 2012, 08:50:24 AM
|
The way ESPN national recruiting analyst Tom Luginbill sees it, Alabama's August could feature a heated competition for the backup quarterback job between Ely and Morris.
"He fits more of their mold of what they want their quarterback to look like, what they want him to be," Luginbill said of the 6-foot-3, 235-pound Morris. "I think this thrusts him right into the fray to hopefully create an environment of competition that those coaches want to have.
"It won't take very long before he enters himself into the mix."
Let's hope Lunginbill is right.
|
|
|
13400
|
Around Campus / The Quad / Re: Alabama Softball escapes with 1-0 victory, advances to championship game
|
on: May 11, 2012, 08:48:36 PM
|
I have to give the defense a big kudo today. As Lee said, Traina didn't have her best stuff today but boy did the defense come up big when she needed help. With the bats being as silent as they were, this team found another way to win today.
Tomorrow should be an interresting game since Bama has just beaten Florida in their season ending series last weekend. Traina has got to be a little worn but here of late she has just sucked it up and gotten the job done. Can she do it one more time??? Roll Tide!!!
Ed Zachary! Great defensive play, and a tired but determined Traina.
|
|
|
13402
|
Around Campus / The Quad / Re: POLL: Should SEC Championship Game be decided by overall or divisional record?
|
on: May 11, 2012, 08:47:26 AM
|
I like things the way they are, especially now that we have 6 games in your division and 2 in the other. South Carolina lost to Auburn 16-13 last year, while UGA beat the tar out of them 45-7. The pitiful home loss to Auburn is what knocked them out of the game in Atlanta, not the loss to Arkansas. The bottom line is SC did not handle their business against the easy teams from the West, where UGA did. They did not have to win that Arkansas game at all if they had taken care of business.
Let's think this through for just a second. If you beat everyone in your division, you can still afford one loss to the other division and still win because you would have the head to head tiebreaker over everyone else in your division. You would need 2 losses to the other division to knock yourself out of contention, and even then there would have to be someone else in your division who won all of their games except for that head to head loss. That is exactly what happened to South Carolina last year.
So, as it is right now, a loss to the other division already does not hurt as bad as a loss within your division. If you beat everyone else in your division, you will always be able to afford at least one more loss to the other division than what your competitors have. In other words, SC could have lost 2 games to the west, had UGA lost 1 game to the west. SC could have lost all 3 games with the west, if UGA had lost 2 games to the west. This current system still gives you an advantage if you beat everyone in your division, yet every game is still important.
In hindsight, I think UGA may have actually been the better team last year, especially by the end of the season. SC caught UGA the week after a very disappointing loss to Boise State where they let the entire conference down, and SC barely beat them 45-42. Later in the season SC was squeaking by Miss St. 14-12, losing to Auburn, and they only beat Tennessee 14-3. Meanwhile UGA lost the first 2 and didn't lose again during the regular season, winning the next 10 in a row.
Which hints at another scheduling issue. Playing tougher opponents from the opposite side is definitely a disadvantage, like an east team playing Bama and LSU where another team might play Ole Miss and Miss State. The other scheduling issue is like when Bama played 5 or 6 SEC games in a row, and every team had a bye week before playing Bama. This also was a scheduling disadvantage. Saban's quote, that the problem is parity in schedules, is spot on. But Spurrier's proposal only addresses one aspect of that lack of parity, diminishes the importance of SEC non-divisional games, and therefore is more akin to whining about USCe's schedule, something Saban avoided for the most part about Bama's schedule (letting the talking heads bring it up, and mostly addressing the matter behind the scenes rather than pubically complaining). I don't think we can do away with divisions in football because they don't play as many games as basketball, for good reason. Also, the SECCG is a huge money maker for SEC teams, and that isn't going away -- since the SEC started this game, other conferences have seen its benefit and are copying the SEC. That's why the Big10 and PAC10 increased to 12 teams, and why the Big 12 is trying to keep 12 teams. I think you are correct SC, Georgia ultimately was better than USCe last year. They gave LSU a run for their money in the SECCG. Georgia instituted a 3-4 defense, similar to Bama's, and it took a few games for the new system to gel. After giving up points to BSU and USCe, Georgia's defense started looking better. Georgia should be better still this year, even under CMR.
|
|
|
13404
|
Around Campus / The Quad / Re: POLL: Should SEC Championship Game be decided by overall or divisional record?
|
on: May 10, 2012, 02:15:19 PM
|
I voted for divisional winners. I would not have done that in the past with 5 divisional games and 3 from the other side. Beginning this year it will be 6-2. You play the exact schedule as everyone else within the division. IMO it really does not matter which way it goes. Normally the best team wins either way.
There are arguments both ways. If/When the SEC expands again, I think it will happen.
|
|
|
13405
|
Around Campus / The Quad / Re: POLL: Should SEC Championship Game be decided by overall or divisional record?
|
on: May 10, 2012, 12:25:06 PM
|
I think the only way you would play in the SECCG with only the best divisional record, is if you only play games within your division. If you're going to play games with teams from the other division as well, IMO, the overall record has to matter.
I think this is right. Coaches may gripe about their schedule, but suppose LSU had lost 2 games versus east opponents last year but squeaked out their win versus Bama. You want the best teams in the SECCG, and that should be the teams with the best conference records. Had USCe beaten the Barn last year, or Arkansas, they would have made it. ricky, I think you may have voted for divisional winners!
|
|
|
13406
|
Around Campus / The Quad / POLL: Should SEC Championship Game be decided by overall or divisional record?
|
on: May 10, 2012, 09:54:38 AM
|
ESPN had an interesting discussion today following Spurrier's comments that participants in the SECCG should be decided by their divisional record, and not by their overall SEC record. Clearly, this was a swipe at Georgia, which USCe beat last season and which played easier SEC west teams than USCe. But Les Miles has jumped on the bandwagon too, with LSU's east rivalry being Florida, and also playing USCe this year. (Bama plays TN and MO). Given that the SEC has expanded and now there are only 2 cross-divisional games each year, the proposal seems to have more merit than it might in the past. Also, that is how the NFL decides things. On the other side of the argument, with the current system every game counts. Hence, the poll.
|
|
|
13407
|
Around Campus / The Quad / Hot Corner: Tide coaches really show up
|
on: May 10, 2012, 09:42:39 AM
|
Click here for link If you're attending this weekend's SEC softball tournament at Alabama's Rhoads Stadium, or simply tuning in to the nationally televised broadcast, here's some advice.
Keep your eyes peeled. You might just spot a coach from one of the Crimson Tide's other sports.
It's probably unfair to call it a new development, but it's certainly been noticeable over the past month or so. Alabama's coaches have seemingly made a conscientious effort to support to their fellow coaches by, well, showing up.
|
|
|
|
|
User Info
|
|
Next Game
|
|
vs. |
|
Day: | Saturday |
Date: | 8/31/2024 |
Time: | TBD |
TV: | TBD |
Radio: | Fun 92.7 |
Location: | Bryant-Denny Stadium Tuscaloosa, AL |
|
Recent Tweets
|
|
New Members
|
- Wsimpson174 - 30 Apr
- tzadick - 14 Nov
- debtidefan - 11 Jan
- OneOfTheIV - 30 Jul
- mepboy - 02 Dec
- Crimsonchamp22 - 19 Oct
- CoachEidson88 - 05 Sep
- Rascal - 02 Jun
- mr mako - 12 Jan
- bamarich - 12 Nov
- Bamarae - 31 Aug
- Red Elephant - 09 Jan
- TideRavens - 02 Dec
- mowood - 30 Nov
- PARMAN59 - 11 Nov
- EpicnessTV - 08 Nov
- wad3g - 22 Sep
- DCTBama - 22 Aug
- BamaMom - 03 May
- RideCharlieLikeAHarley - 14 Mar
|
Board Stats
|
- Total Members: 352
- Total Posts: 400885
- Total Topics: 49160
- Total Categories: 2
- Total Boards: 22
- Most Online: 1020
|
|